This Vaughan divorce mediation case scenario underscores several key challenges typically encountered during divorce proceedings and demonstrates why opting for divorce mediation — specifically, the Soft Landing Divorce Settlement Method — is often a more prosperous and less stressful choice than conventional litigation.
Fred, a resident of Woodbridge, is a dedicated employee at a Concord-based company. Noted for his intelligence and loyalty, he’s considered by his peers as someone with immense potential for senior management. Fred is also a devoted family man, taking tremendous pride in his two children. He and his wife, Rose, had been married for fifteen years when his life was abruptly thrown into disarray
One evening, after their children were tucked in bed, Rose approached Fred with the unexpected news: she was done with the marriage. Despite their efforts with marriage counselling, their differences remained unsolved. Rose shared that her lawyer had suggested divorce mediation as a less expensive and less time-consuming alternative to divorce litigation. She presented Fred with an ultimatum — they either enlist a divorce mediator, or she would initiate the divorce proceedings.
Fred was distraught and resentful. Why should he make the divorce process easier for Rose when she was the one who wanted out? Despite his emotions, Fred decided to educate himself on Vaughan’s area of divorce mediation. Upon his research, he recognized that engaging an Ontario divorce mediator was a quicker and more straightforward alternative to litigation.
Sitting alone in his study, Fred felt confronted by a difficult choice. If he opted for divorce mediation, the end of his marriage would be expedited, and he would likely have to move out of their shared home. He feared this could result in limited visitation with his children. Conversely, a prolonged court battle could drain his finances, as it had his friend Casey’s. Moreover, divorce litigation had strained Casey’s relationship with his young daughter and caused a rift with his teenage one. Fred was in a lose-lose situation.
The next day, Fred reached out to Divorce the Smartway and discussed his predicament with divorce mediator Ken Maynard. As a result, Fred, along with Rose, decided to attend an initial divorce mediation consultation. At the meeting, they shared details about their assets, debts, children, and lifestyles with Mr. Maynard, who promptly encouraged a civil discourse between the two.
As tension mounted and communication faltered, Mr. Maynard skilfully implemented the Soft Landing Divorce Settlement Method. This process prompted Fred and Rose to focus on their most pressing concerns. Above all, they agreed that their children’s welfare was paramount.
Fred voiced his worries about spending less time with his children and potentially losing their savings in a litigated divorce. On the other hand, Rose was eager to move forward and recognized that litigation could hinder her progress. After several mediation sessions, with Ken Maynard’s guidance, Rose and Fred successfully addressed each critical issue, explored viable solutions, divided their assets and debts fairly, and, most importantly, agreed upon a parenting plan that ensured strong relationships with their children.
By opting for mediation, specifically the Soft Landing Divorce Settlement Method, the couple arrived at a mutually beneficial agreement that provided them peace of mind. Today, Fred and Rose maintain an amicable relationship, and their children are thriving, free from witnessing parental conflict. Moreover, the cost of their divorce was a fraction of what it would have been had they chosen litigation. In a wise decision during mediation, they earmarked the money saved to be invested in their children’s college fund.
This case reinforces the potential benefits of divorce mediation, especially the Soft Landing Divorce Settlement Method, as a compassionate, cost-effective and children-focused alternative to traditional divorce litigation.
